On 9 March 2011 14:17, 1Z <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Phlogiston was eliminated, heat was reduced. There's a difference

So on this basis you would claim that heat is *ontologically* (i.e.
not merely epistemologically) distinguishable from molecular motion?

>
>
> On Mar 9, 1:46 pm, David Nyman <da...@davidnyman.com> wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 13:30, 1Z <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Peter, this is too confusing, you seem to be debating a straw man.
>> Let's try to keep it simple: am I to assume that you don't agree that
>> ontological reduction entails ontological elimination?
>>
>> David
>>
> Yep.
> Phlogiston was eliminated, heat was reduced. There's a difference
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to