On Mar 9, 5:15 pm, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> On 3/9/2011 5:30 AM, 1Z wrote:
> > Zombies are not a typical example of the problems of reduction,
> > they are an instance of the reduction being bought too cheaply:
> > the reductive materialist presents the off-the-peg conclusion that
> > consciousness
> > "just is" neural firing, without filling in the explanation that
> > allows
> > us to see that it*must be*, so that we instead remain being able to
> > see that it
> > *might not*  be!
> But keep in mind what counts as "explanation".  In science it is really
> just a model that tells us how something can manipulated.

As opposed to what?  I think explanation supports modal
claims. I think models do as well. If you always get a result
however you manipulate a model, it's necessary within that
model. If you sometimes do, it's possible. Never, impossible.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to