Hi Nick,

On Apr 2, 7:22 am, Nick Prince <nickmag.pri...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Yes agreed.  Also if timelike entanglements occurred there would be
> less worry about conflict with relativity than there was originally
> with spacelike effects.  However if I understand decoherence
> correctly, information from the system passes into the environment so
> it is there somehow but very dispersed.  

  Yes, but only rarely is the "environment" an ideal gas or monolithic
solid such that our usual ideas of diffusion and dispersal will apply.
I suspect that we need to think about how decoherence works in a
framework that takes into consideration a wide variety of rates and
that considers how the phase entanglement is distributed. I have tried
to find work examining this and only recently some papers have come
out. See: http://www.quantiki.org/wiki/Decoherence-free_subspaces and
  It took a while, but Tegmark's no-go is finally loosing its hold. (I
swear that guy is the reincarnation of Lord Kelvin!)

  From what I can tell decoherence is more of an effects that
disperses among the many-worlds and not one that spreads within a
single world - like photons. We really do not have good physical
analogies for it!

>I did write a paper once(when
> I was younger and more stupid, so it has very doubtful worth) but I
> tried to formalise mathematically how memories might be stored in
> space time rather than in the brain at all ie working on the idea that
> the brain was more of an aeriel rather than a hard drive.  These
> memories could then be later picked up by a simulated entity by
> appropriate tuning. It was a stab in the dark.


 Interesting idea! It reminds me of Sheldrake's Morphic fields. I
think that James P. Hogan wrote a novel based on a similar idea also,
except in "Paths to Otherwhere" the ideas was to "tune" in on
differing parallel worlds and even travel between them.
  I think that we still do not fully understand the implications of


> On Apr 2, 1:59 am, stephenk <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
> >     The idea that the EPR effect would work across time-like as well
> > as space-like intervals makes sense in light of relativity. I am
> > surprised that more people have not looked into it! The main
> > difficulty I see is that there is a huge prejudice against the idea
> > that macroscopic systems can be entangled such that EPR type relations
> > could hold and have effects like you are considering here. Most of the
> > arguments for decoherence inevitably assume that *all* of the degrees
> > of freedom of a QM system are subject to one and the same decoherence
> > rate with its environment. What if this is not the case? What if there
> > is a stratification of sorts possible within macroscopic systems such
> > that degrees of freedom can decohere are differing rates? Correlations
> > of the EPR type would be possible within these, it seems to me...

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to