On Apr 19, 7:26 am, Rex Allen <rexallen31...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:26 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > On 4/18/2011 9:55 AM, Rex Allen wrote:
> >> If there are commonalities in individuals who manifest certain
> >> behaviors, then it makes sense to look at those commonalities as
> >> causal (especially once a plausible mechanism can be identified), and
> >> to no longer treat those behaviors as "free".
> >> In most situations it doesn't make sense to look at each individual as
> >> unique and "free"...instead it makes sense to look at what is common
> >> accross individuals and assume the existence of a mechanism that
> >> accounts for those commonalities.
> > So if almost everyone is deterred from committing crimes by community
> > approbation and fear of punishment, the person who does commit a crime
> > should be treated as "free"?
> If we consider the case of this person, and are unable to see any
> plausible explanation that could account for their behavior - no
> commonalities with other cases, nothing that matches against any other
> statistics, no plausible mechanisms from sociology, neurology,
> psychiatry, medicine, biology, genetics, chemistry, or physics...then
> sure, treat him as “free”.
> That was exactly the situation we were in a thousand years ago.  And
> it was justifiable - in that the approach does “work” to some extent,
> and they didn’t know of any better way to go about it.
> I just think that there are better ways to go about it now.
> It would be odd if we have access to all of the above information, and
> all of the productivity and wealth of the modern world  - and yet we
> can’t really come up with any significantly better approaches to
> ordering society than “Getting Tough on Crime” or “Three Strikes”
> laws.

You keep trying to link by sheer repetition ideas that are logically
whether libertarian FW is meaningful and true; and whether a punitive
to crime is right. The 70% of people in 36 countries will  include a
lot who
live under justice regimes considerably more liberal than that of the

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to