On Apr 19, 7:28 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote: > On 19 Apr 2011, at 07:38, Rex Allen wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Rex Allen <rexallen31...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> > >> wrote: > > >>> Th fact that you say that compatibilist free will is "faux will" > >>> or worst > >>> "subjective will" means that you *do* believe in incompatibilist > >>> free will. > > > Ah, I see what you're saying. > > > I've mentioned this before. I think that libertarians are referring > > to *something* when they use "free will". It's just something that > > doesn't exist. Like unicorns, or the bibilical Triune God. > > Yeah, but we agree. That's the incompatibilist free-will. > > Since then, Artificial Intelligence Research is born, and Mechanist > theories have gone through the Gödel, and the Church-Turing > "revolution". Now many are open to the idea that machine can be > conscious, and it is not far stretched to defend the idea that they > can have a sort of free will similar to our own.
Or that it would be an incompatibilist Free Will! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.