On Apr 19, 7:28 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2011, at 07:38, Rex Allen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Rex Allen <rexallen31...@gmail.com>  
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be>  
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Th fact that you say that compatibilist free will is "faux will"  
> >>> or worst
> >>> "subjective will" means that you *do* believe in incompatibilist  
> >>> free will.
>
> > Ah, I see what you're saying.
>
> > I've mentioned this before.  I think that libertarians are referring
> > to *something* when they use "free will".  It's just something that
> > doesn't exist.  Like unicorns, or the bibilical Triune God.
>
> Yeah, but we agree. That's the incompatibilist free-will.
>
> Since then, Artificial Intelligence Research is born, and Mechanist  
> theories have gone through the Gödel, and the Church-Turing  
> "revolution". Now many are open to the idea that machine can be  
> conscious, and it is not far stretched to defend the idea that they  
> can have a sort of free will similar to our own.

Or that it  would be an incompatibilist Free Will!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to