On Apr 19, 7:28 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2011, at 07:38, Rex Allen wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Rex Allen <rexallen31...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Th fact that you say that compatibilist free will is "faux will"
> >>> or worst
> >>> "subjective will" means that you *do* believe in incompatibilist
> >>> free will.
> > Ah, I see what you're saying.
> > I've mentioned this before. I think that libertarians are referring
> > to *something* when they use "free will". It's just something that
> > doesn't exist. Like unicorns, or the bibilical Triune God.
> Yeah, but we agree. That's the incompatibilist free-will.
> Since then, Artificial Intelligence Research is born, and Mechanist
> theories have gone through the Gödel, and the Church-Turing
> "revolution". Now many are open to the idea that machine can be
> conscious, and it is not far stretched to defend the idea that they
> can have a sort of free will similar to our own.
Or that it would be an incompatibilist Free Will!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at