New version of summary: http://www.stationlink.com/docs/Executive_Summary_SEE_TOE_v4.pdf
On Jul 1, 8:44 am, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I was recommended to check out this group and before I really get > into it, I wanted to post some information about my ideas in their > pristine state, and then I can relax and let my mind be invaded by > what the other members here have been talking about. I would recommend > to the reader as well, that they try to, as much as possible, come to > this information from a completely neutral perspective, ie, as if they > were hearing an description of the cosmos for the first time rather > than putting it into existing philosophical categories (again, 'as > much as possible')... because I think that there's a chance that I'm > saying something new here. > > Here is an executive summary of my executive summary (http:// > s33light.org/SEEES) : > > A. Semiotic Cosmology > 1. All phenomena can be described in terms of patterns, but not > all patterns can be understood as objects. > 2. Objects are a second-hand experience. > 3. Sense is a fundamental, universal property (cosmos has to make > sense before we can make sense out of it) > > B. Proposed Unified Electromagnetic-Sensorimotive Topology > 1. Rather than consciousness being 'caused' electromagnetically, > consciousness is an elaboration of awareness>feeling>sense>detection, > which is the "interior" manifold/topology of electromagnetic patterns > within matter. > 2. Electromagnetism does not exist as a freestanding phenomenon > in space, but rather it and all forms of energy are experiences of > matter - telesemantically shared sensorimotive experiences which are, > to varying degrees participatory and defined by the interference > pattern between the public electromagnetic and private/shared > sensorimotive rather than purely passive/deterministic. > 3. It could be said that Electro-sensory is like the Read/Input > privileged format, Motive-magnetic is the Write/Output privileged > format. (Not necessarily strictly true, but useful in relating the two > topologies..you could use magnetic or electrical stimulation to push > changes to consciousness in the brain I would imagine). > 4. The entire Standard Model becomes obsolete as an authoritative > cosmology. Rather than a Quantum Limit, we run into a Copernican > Limit, beyond which the purely exterior topology becomes inappropriate > and we need to re-imagine Quantum Observations as something more like > shared atomic moods. > > C. ACME-ΩMMM Continuum > > 1. Human philosophical and psychological perspectives can be > organized meaningfully through a spectrum ranging from extremely > literal/generic/objective to the figurative/proprietary/subjective. > (mural:http://www.stationlink.com/art/comp7.jpg) > 2. In the center of the spectrum, phenomena can be described as > mundane and straightforward, with the difference between the interior > essential topology (i.e. Mind) and the exterior existential topology > (Matter) is maximally divergent and dimorphic (yet most intertwined). > Think of this as the crossover point in a figure eight. > 3. The 'ends' of the continuum are opposite: profound and > esoteric (think Psychedelic Shamanism on the subjective end, or > Quantum Physics on the objective). The two ends meet in the ineffable, > monastic Zen of self-realization/annihilation. > > D. Perception is Relativity > 1. Relativity orders physical effects into inertial frames, > while perception organizes sensorimotive gestalts through experiential > frames of reference. > 2. Perception is the private, signifying, perspective-twisted > subjectivity correlate to public, a-signifying, generic objectivity. > > E. Space, Time, and Gravity are Void > 1. Space is a logical projection of perception-relativity to > describe the relation between the exterior of phenomena. If you > imagine a universe composed of an ideal sphere and nothing more, there > is no possibility of externally realizable movement (since there is > nothing to compare it to as a frame of reference). Space is nothing > more than semantic orientation. > 2. Time is an interior logic of subjective experience, an > aggregate measure of 'change' (semantic comparison of one condition > and another remembered or recorded and observed condition) modeled in > a linear fashion. It has no existence of it's own beyond our sense of > sequential causality (which evaporates predictably under altered > states of consciousness - dreams, drugs, trance, etc). We are the ones > who interpret the digits on the clocks and the calender squares as a > shared temporal text. In reality, there are no days, just > astrophysical orientations woven together by our memories and > monitoring of regular oscillating patterns. > > 3. Like space, time can only be as discrete or continuous as > the substances and processes we use to measure it. What we are > measuring is not an objective condition, but our own normalized > intersubjective detection of relations between patterns of energy/ > change. > > 4. Gravity is the evanescence of electromagnetic-sensorimotive > momentum. It's matter wanting to return to the singularity. It's the > entropy which collapses the projection of spacetime. > > Let me know what you think. This is sort of something I've been > thinking of for almost 40 years, so I would encourage any reader to > really let it sink in. I know my writing style may be offputting to > some, but please try to get to the ideas underneath here. This isn't > about me being right, I really could care less, I'm just interested in > finding out how exactly I'm wrong. Otherwise I'm tempted to proclaim > that this worldview takes a significant step toward resolving a lot of > timeless philosophical questions as well as contemporary conundrums in > physics and neurology. Delusions of grandeur? Probably. What's the > harm in considering it though? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.