"I never claimed to know the identity of it."

so then what are you talking about?

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Constantine Pseudonymous <
> bsor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jason: "I can easily prove to
>> you at least one thing must be self-existent for there to be anything
>> at
>> all"
>>
>> It looks like we have not assimilated the history of philosophy here.
>> I thought we did away with these classical metaphysical speculations.
>> Did you not read Kant?
>>
>> You may be able to "prove" it.... but you will never be able to
>> demonstrate or know the identity of "it". So you bs.
>>
>>
> I never claimed to know the identity of it.
>
> Jason
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to