Rex:
"I believe that conscious experience exists, fundamentally and uncaused."

You believe monadic current of conscious experience is eternal?

Then why is your awareness or memory of it so fragile and finite?

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Rex Allen <rexallen31...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Constantine Pseudonymous
> <bsor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Rex, I think your onto something here.... let me add a little
> > critique:
> > "1.  Explanation is subordinate to description.
> >
> >  2.  Description is subordinate to observation.
> >
> >  3.  Observation is subordinate to experience.
> >
> >  4.  And now we want to close the circle by explaining experience."
> >
> > you distinguish between observation and experience? nonsense.
>
> I’m using “observation” as the term for particular instances or
> aspects of experience.
>
> So, no, I don’t actually distinguish between observation and
> experience in any significant way.
>
>
> > "However, our explanation of experience can only be justified by
> > appeal  to experience - plus reason."
> >
> > Before jumping to explanation of experience you might want to hang out
> > at the problem of description of experience.... which is an element of
> > experience itself, or in so far as it is possible, a tautology.  Does
> > any such description of experience exist?
>
> I can describe my experience to you in terms of fundamental concepts
> which I possess - but unless you have access to those same concepts,
> then my description won’t make any sense to you.
>
>
> > FURTHERMORE
> >
> > you assume there is in existence any such explanation of experience or
> > existence.
> >
> > show me one explanation of experience. even if it existed it would be
> > a mere feature of experience.
>
> I don’t assume that there is any sort of "ultimate" explanation for
> experience.  In fact, I assume that there is not.
>
>
> > Do you believe in a objective world or totality? Do you believe in an
> > objective experience of experience-description? Do you believe in a
> > objective reality, universal and totalizing, that can represent itself
> > as such?
>
> I believe that conscious experience exists, fundamentally and uncaused.
>
>
> > "And there’s just the general question of what “reason” means in a
> >  deterministic world, or a probabilistic world, or a purely contingent
> > world."
> >
> > Or how about a world which is a vague approximation of all three and
> > more.
>
> And more?  What is this “more” to which you refer?
>
>
> Rex
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to