On 8/7/2011 5:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
That's why I sometimes return to my engineering viewpoint. It is
easy to speculate that some overarching "everything" construct
includes us and our world as an infinitesimal part.
I suspect a confusion with tegmark's kind of mathematicalism. Comp
gives us (us = the UMs and LUMs) the big role in the emergence of
physics; not an infinitesimal role at all.
Isn't that the measure (aka "white rabbit") problem. Can you show that
the UD does not generate inifinitely many Newtonian worlds? or chaotic
worlds? Do you have to rely on anthropic selection?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at