On Sep 23, 8:41 am, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On 23 Sep 2011, at 07:37, Roger Granet wrote: > > > Bruno, > > > Hi. Yes, I am pretty much a materialist/physicalist. > > So, you cannot defend the idea that the brain (or whatever responsible > for our consciousness) is Turing emulable. OK? >
Bruno: When you state “that the brain (or whatever responsible for our consciousness) is Turing emulable”…in using the term Turing “emulable” do you mean that the brain is being imitated, is represented, is an instantiation, or something stronger such as the Turing machine actually having inducted number properties of “encoded” information. Could you clarify why the term Turing “emulable” is used and not Turing “represented” or Turing “instantiated” or even Turing “encoded”? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
