On 9/25/2011 5:27 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 6:35 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net
On 9/25/2011 11:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I mentioned QM only to mentioned a computer emulable theory of
I find quite possible that QM explains biochemistry, given the
of chemistry the SWE equation allow (molecules and the electronic shape
is really what QM explains the most elegantly and successfully, but
besides my point).
But you are coherent: if you want materialism, you will need a non
emulable theory of matter, and of mind.
Good luck, because it needs already some amount of work to conceive
not Turing emulable in math, and in physics, it is even more difficult.
But QM is based on complex numbers over the reals, which are already not
Has a real number ever been measured by any physicist?
Sure. He measured one side of the right triangle to be 1cubit and the other side to be
1cubit and concluded that the third side was sqrt(2)cubit.
"All measurement is theory burdened."
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at