On Dec 8, 9:33 am, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The UD argument is not a proof of computationalism being true, is an
> argument that shows computationalism (I can be run on a digital computer)
> is not compatible with materialism. It shows that to be able to predict
> your next moment (if computationlism is true) then the primitive material
> world is of no use (if there is one).
>
> Computationalism can be false, but the argument is not about it being true,
> it is about considering it true and see the implications.

Doesn't computationalism already imply independence from materialism
by definition?

Craig

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to