On Dec 8, 9:33 am, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote: > The UD argument is not a proof of computationalism being true, is an > argument that shows computationalism (I can be run on a digital computer) > is not compatible with materialism. It shows that to be able to predict > your next moment (if computationlism is true) then the primitive material > world is of no use (if there is one). > > Computationalism can be false, but the argument is not about it being true, > it is about considering it true and see the implications.
Doesn't computationalism already imply independence from materialism by definition? Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.