On 12/8/2011 6:33 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
The UD argument is not a proof of computationalism being true, is an argument that shows
computationalism (I can be run on a digital computer) is not compatible with
materialism. It shows that to be able to predict your next moment (if computationlism is
true) then the primitive material world is of no use (if there is one).
I don't think so. It is patently untrue that the material world model is of no use in
predicting your next experience. In fact it is essentially the only useful model for
"I wonder if practitioners of alternative medicine would fly in airliners designed by
--- TG, Holistic Lawyer
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at