On 11 Dec 2011, at 07:13, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/10/2011 3:50 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Some say that the interference of particles "with themselves" in
the two-slit experiment is amble evidence for these, but MWI does
nothing to explain why we observe the particular universe that we
Comp explains this completely, by explaining why you cannot
understand that you are the one ending in Washington instead as the
one ending in Moscow. It explains contingencies by consistent
But then starting from Philadelphia instead of Brussels "you" should
end up in Washington - since it is much more similar to Philadelphia.
That might indeed be the case if my consciousness supervene on a
generalized brain including a city, which get an internal role in the
computation leading to your state. But in that case you have to ask
the doctor to do the awkward substitution at *that* level.
In the W and M duplication experience, we assume that the brain is the
usual biological one in the skull. All what will matter in the
probabilities is the distinguishibility of the self-localization
outcome after the duplication. IN QM terms, seeing Brussels,
Washington, and Philadelphia are orthogonal state, and not part of the
brain, or of the computation leading to the state before the
In front of the (concrete or not) UD, your consciousness will do the
selection at the right level. (Again like in the Quantum MW).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at