On Dec 12, 8:40 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 5:04 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 12:36 pm, meekerdb<meeke...@verizon.net>  wrote:
> >> On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> >>> If recordings were conscious, wouldn't they evolve behind our backs?
> >> Why would consciousness imply evolution?  Evolution requires reproduction 
> >> and differential
> >> selection.
> > I was talking about evolving in a general sense of changing and
> > progressing, not natural selection. If a cartoon is conscious in any
> > way, why doesn't it keep going by itself?
>
> Maybe it requires a certain environment.  It requires a projector and screen. 
>  You require
> oxygen, food, and water.

That's just sophistry. A projector and screen can't add scenes to a
cartoon. Recordings make don't make any changes to themselves which
extend their semantic content. Unless you have a counterfactual in
mind?

Craig

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to