On 21 Dec 2011, at 18:30, meekerdb wrote:

On 12/21/2011 8:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
This may require the input of random numbers on the synapses.

This, I think, would directly contradict computationalism (unless you mean pseudo-random, or the randomness recoverable by the comp indeterminacy). By definition of "correct level" you keep both of them "intact" through a single turing emulation in your local "physical" reality.

If you rely on the thermal interaction with the environment, then you save comp at the expense of enlarging the local reality to be simulated.

Not necessarily. If the dependence is statistical I am not obliged to emulate the exact environment. But for some logical purpose we might imagine the foolish idea that our consciousness depends on the computational precise state of some large environment. The Heisenberg Matrix of our galaxies cluster at the level of M theory, for example. That's demanding a lot to the doctor, of course. But the UD provides it in infinitely many exemplars including the consistent extensions, for free (assuming 0, s(0), ... and the laws of addition and multiplication, only).

It get trivial as explanations, but again, such view are proposed, I think, only through attempts to invalidate the argument that comp leads to immaterialism, or to the reduction of the mind-body problem to a body problem appearance in computer science/arithmetic.



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to