On Dec 22, 7:13 pm, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is because of the modularity of our brains:
> Different sections of the brain perform specific functions.  Some neurons
> may serve only as communication links between different regions in the
> brain, while others may be involved in processing.  I think that the
> malfunction and correction of a "communication neuron" might not alter
> Alice's experience, in the same way we could correct a faulty signal in her
> optic nerve and not expect her experience to be affected.  I am less sure,
> however, that a neuron involved in processing could have its function
> replaced by a randomly received particle, as this changes the definition of
> the machine.
> Think of a register containing a bit '1'.  If the bit is '1' because two
> inputs were received and the logical AND operation is applied, this is an
> entirely different computation from two bits being ANDed, the result placed
> in that register, then (regardless of the result) the bit '1' is set in
> that register.  This erases any effect of the two input bits, and redefines
> the computation altogether.  This 'set 1' instruction is much like the
> received particles from the super nova causing neurons to fire.  It is a
> very shallow computation, and in my opinion, not likely to lead to any
> consciousness.

This study suggests that the mind should not be modeled in that way:

"For decades, the cognitive and neural sciences have treated mental
processes as though they involved passing discrete packets of
information in a strictly feed-forward fashion from one cognitive
module to the next or in a string of individuated binary symbols --
like a digital computer," said Spivey. "More recently, however, a
growing number of studies, such as ours, support dynamical-systems
approaches to the mind. In this model, perception and cognition are
mathematically described as a continuous trajectory through a high-
dimensional mental space; the neural activation patterns flow back and
forth to produce nonlinear, self-organized, emergent properties --
like a biological organism."

Their findings support my view that consciousness is biological
awareness, not modular computation.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to