On Dec 23, 1:46 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:

> >> All of which is emulable by a digital computer.
> > Emulable to whose judgment?
> The judgement of people who have successfully emulated continuous, non-linear 
> processes in
> high-dimensional spaces using digital computers.

They have their opinion of success, but the processes being emulated
may have another.

> >>> Their findings support my view that consciousness is biological
> >>> awareness, not modular computation.
> >> Except computation is well defined.  We know how make something that does 
> >> computation.
> > Sure, which is why it's so seductive to jump to the conclusion that
> > consciousness could be computation alone. It's sentimental, not
> > scientific to make that assumption.
> It's not a conclusion, it's an hypothesis.  When you form an hypothesis to 
> explain some
> phenomena it's always a good idea to put it in terms of something you 
> understand.
> Otherwise you just end up "explaining" the phenomena by describing it other 
> words you
> don't understand either.

Or you can expand the terms of your understanding to suit the actual
nature of the phenomenon you are explaining.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to