On 26 Dec 2011, at 18:48, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/26/2011 2:09 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Even if the physics is not concrete, but purely phenomenological as
indicated by steps 1-7 of the UDA, and if the consciousness
it, it is still physical supervenience, surely.
Not in the usual sense of supervenience, or what I call sup-phys.
It is a notion invented by the materialist/naturalist.
We can still have (and we shoud have) a remaining comp-phys
I guess I should make this clearer. SUP-PHYS is SUP-PRIMITIVE-PHYS.
So are saying that consciousness must always supervene on physics,
but that the physics (and the consciousness) is not fundamental;
Both arise from computation?
Yes. That's why I say that the coupling consciousness/realities arise
from arithmetic/computations. Human consciousness might really
supervene on the local physics, but Löbian consciousness is
responsible for the earlier filtering of material realties which can
give rise to that local physics. This is handled mathematically by the
"material hypostases" (Bp & Dt (& p)).
From the points of view of a machine, it always seems her
consciousness is related to *some* physics. Our type of physics allows
dream sharing, which comes from its first person plural nature (the
multiplication of population of machines).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at