On Dec 27, 4:22 pm, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>wrote:
> "An apple isn't an apple unless an *actual* worm can live in it."
> A simulated apple is a perfectly real and objective phenomenon, it's true
> that a real worm can't live in one but a simulated worm can. It's important
> not to confuse levels however, a simulated flame won't burn your computer
> but it will burn a simulated object.
A simulated flame will do anything your simulation proscribes. That's
why it's not real. A simulated apple can turn into Mickey Mouse every
third Wednesday at midnight. A picture of an apple is not an apple.
Even a fancy animated picture.
> A real flame won't burn the laws of
> chemistry but it will burn your finger. And some things cross all levels,
> like information processing;
Information cannot cross any levels on it's own. Cartoons don't wander
off the TV screen and move into the spare bedroom.
> there is no difference between simulated
> arithmetic and real arithmetic
Because there is no real arithmetic. There is no simulated Mickey
Mouse either. Subjects can't be simulated, only imitated or
> or between simulated intelligence and real
That's a religious faith in my opinion. If I make a movie where the
actors address the audience as Jim, and then have a screening where I
invite only people named Jim, then I have simulated intelligence
without any real intelligence at all.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at