On 1/6/2012 11:26 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Using your URL, my result is Leviticus 49000 Feyerabend 32500. And that's just on the
internet. Leviticus was cited some before the internet.
On 06.01.2012 20:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/6/2012 8:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi<use...@rudnyi.ru> wrote:
This statement contradict to a normal scientific world view but it
is based on historical facts. Hence it well might be that you have
to read more about Galileo.
As for Feyerabend (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Feyerabend)
"Feyerabend became famous for his purportedly anarchistic view of
science and his rejection of the existence of universal
methodological rules. He is an influential figure in the
philosophy of science, and also in the sociology of scientific
His book Against method has been cited more than 6000 times
according to Google Scholar
This does not mean that everybody has to agree with him but a
statement about an idiot looks exaggerated.
I'm sure Leviticus has been cited even more times.
Just run Google Scholar
and you see that Leviticus looses to Feyerabend. As you have mentioned previously we
should rely "on empirical evidence, not ratiocination".
Brent "The philosophy of science is just about as useful to
scientists as ornithology is to birds." --- Steven Weinberg
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at