On Feb 21, 8:03 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 21, 5:21 am, 1Z <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Feb 20, 6:37 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Right, but true = a true reflection of the simulation. > > > No. True = true of unsimulated reality. > > Where is there unsimulated reality in comp?
As ever, that depends what you mean by comp. CTM doens't require anything to be simulated at all. in Bruno;s Platonic COMP, the unsimulated reailty is a Plato's heaven full of numbers. > > > If I make a > > > simulation where I regularly stop the program and make miraculous > > > changes, then the most intelligent observers might rightly conclude > > > that there is an omnipotent entity > > > They can only wrongly conclude that since you are not omnipotent. > > Those who I find doubting my omnipotence will find that there are more > important things than not being wrong. Well, you're not simulating me, so i remain unpersuaded. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
