On Feb 21, 8:03 pm, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 21, 5:21 am, 1Z <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 20, 6:37 pm, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Right, but true = a true reflection of the simulation.
>
> > No. True = true of unsimulated reality.
>
> Where is there unsimulated reality in comp?

As ever, that depends what you mean by comp.
CTM doens't require anything to be simulated at all.
in Bruno;s Platonic COMP, the unsimulated reailty
is a Plato's heaven full of numbers.

> > > If I make a
> > > simulation where I regularly stop the program and make miraculous
> > > changes, then the most intelligent observers might rightly conclude
> > > that there is an omnipotent entity
>
> > They can only wrongly conclude that since you are not omnipotent.
>
> Those who I find doubting my omnipotence will find that there are more
> important things than not being wrong.

Well, you're not simulating me, so i remain unpersuaded.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to