On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 10:46 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Bruno Marchal<marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
>>> When we are dreaming we are in a higher level relative
>>> emulation (all UMs can do that).
>> That's confusing. I find it hard to believe a bacteria can dream. The
>> UM implemented by a bacteria could *potentially* run any program, but
>> it is *actually* running the bacteria program. To suggest that
>> bacteria (e.g. one of the class of "all UMs") can dream by virtue of
>> being definable as a UM generates more confusion than clarity.
>> Put another way, if a particularly instantiated UM possesses the
>> ability to dream (to imagine), then that says something non-trivial
>> about the constitution of that UM's cognitive architecture.
> Hi Terren,
> If a bacterium is a physical system capable of implementing a universal
> Turing machine aka the particular bacteria's program, then Bruno's argument
> shows that it will necessarily be able to dream, for what are dreams if not
> alternative TMs running on the same hardware via dovetailing?
Dreaming in the context of Bruno's remark means that the running of a
single program could result in alternate 1p realities being
constructed... not that multiple programs could be run in the UM. At
least, that's how I interpret it.
A bacteria is a universal machine in that it can potentially run any
program. However, bacteria as they appear to us run specific programs
(as selected by evolution). Their instantiation as such is a stable
measure relative to us - the shared 1p plural reality. Bacteria that
run programs capable of dreaming (as above), while possible, would
probably count as white rabbits.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at