On 3/31/2012 11:11 AM, David Nyman wrote:
The alternative to this analysis is to abandon MWI (or comp) as
inconsistent with the empirical facts. This is the tack Kent in fact
adopts, proposing a mechanism for the pruning of all but one of the
I think he just proposes pruning the density matrix cross-terms by some mechanism. Once
they are gone then the realized branch is just 'selected' stochasitcally per the Born
rule. I've often contemplated such a move based on the idea that there be a smallest
non-zero quantum of probability; but I've not seen a way to make that work.
in the absence of which he clearly feels the
empirical facts cannot be justified. I don't happen to agree with his
reasons, but such a proposal is consistent with his view of the likely
subjective consequences of duplication.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at