On 17 Apr 2012, at 13:33, compscicrackpot wrote:
are you done now? :) whats next?
What is your opinion on UDA step 3, that we have discussed here
We continue the UD Argument on the FOAR list, in case you are
interested. I have just sent the 4th step. Feel free to comment here
This extends Everett-Deutsch approach on QM to a many-worlds or many-
dreams internal interpretations on Arithmetic. It provides also a
revision of Penrose Gödelian argument against mechanism. Gödel's proof
cannot be used to claim that we are not machine, only that we cannot
know which machine we are, nor can we know which computations support
us. Physics has to be derived from statistics on computations, and
this makes the comp hypothesis testable.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at