On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't think so. You go on and on about the profound differences >> between various increasingly convoluted "views" and yet you can't give a >> single example of two things being identical by what you call "the 3-view" >> but not by "the 1-views themselves". >> > > > You keep contradicting what I said, systematically. Give the quotes and > be specific if you really want an explanation. > OK. On April 2 2112 among other things I said "I can understand your desire to gloss over this major difficulty", so on April 3 2112 you responded to that comment with: "I thought you just grasped it. What major difficulty? The only one you have ever mentionned as been shown to be a confusion of 1-view and 3-view (or on the 3-view on the 1-views, and the 1-views themselves. Reread perhaps the preceding posts)." I did reread the previous posts and they were just as clear as the above assortment of words. Not very. John K Clark > want an explanation. > > Bruno > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
