On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> The 1-views are assimilated to the content of the personal diary that the > candidate takes with him in the teleportation or duplication experiments. > The 3-views are corresponding to what is roughly described by an external > observer > Your proof hinges on the fundamental difference between this 1-view and 3-view stuff but you haven't unambiguously nailed down what you mean by those terms as you must if you want to use them in a mathematical proof. In the first place just because a outside observer sees somebody write something in a personal diary does not prove that is what a person feels, it does not prove that is a description of the subjective experience (or the "1-view" in your obscure terminology) or is even proof that a 1-view, any 1-view even exists. The only "1-view" you know for a fact to exist is your own. In the second place despite my repeated requests you can not give me a single example of something identical from the "3-view" but not from the "1-view" and I've lost track of how many times you've chastised me for "misunderstanding" and not looking at things from the "1-view" which is supposed to be very different. > Step 2 illustrates already, without duplication, the difference between > the 1-view and the 3-view. > If things are identical from the 1-view they may or may not be identical from the 3-view, BUT if they are identical from the 1-view then they are always identical from the 1-view. >We can vary arbitrarily the delays in step 2 > Delays are a needless complication that add nothing to the thought experiment. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
