Socratus, and discussion friends:
are we so simpletons, indeed? does a flat EM (field?) plus the 'variety' of
cells constitute a 'person'? does it justify our psychological mistakes? (I
mention deliberately those, not the regularities, to divert from 'rules we
I think (?) a sort of "pattern" functionality (or rather: relations) may be
needed and as I read in these discussions: nobody feels knowledgeable
enough to go into that. This is the 'part' we did not (yet???) learn and I
call it the complexity of a person within the wider complexity of
It is just NOT *THIS AND THAT*.* *
Would you reduce us into - let us say - a million varieties of cells (OK,
make it a billion) plus the one and only EM field - even if in a million
variables of control in interference. I think (in the ongoing theoretical
views) even the RNA has to be directed into directing the DNA - which still
may be only one imaginary factor we speak about for a genetic (?)
And - all this in believing in 'atoms' and a 'physical world'. (And
As I wrote within my diatribe "Science Religion" in 2003.
I stick to my agnosticism, smile upon my 50+ years "actively and result
fully" working as a chemist-Ph.D. and a polymer Science D.Sci. with my 38+
patents and papers, books, and my journal published. Now, past 90 I can
afford to 'not knowing' about what I was brainwashed into in college
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:59 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net <
> Cells make copies of themselves.
> Different cells make different copies of themselves.
> Cells come in all shapes and sizes.
> Somehow these different cells are tied between themselves
> and during pregnancy process of 9 months gradually ( ! )
> and by chance ( or not by chance ) they change own
> geometrical form from zygote to a child.
> Cells come in all shapes and sizes, and then . . . they are you.
> Cells they are you ( !? )
> This is modern biomechanical /chemical point of view.
> Maybe 99% agree that ‘Cells - they are you .’
> But this explanation is not complete.
> Cells have an energy / electrical potential.
> Cells have an electromagnetic field.
> Therefore we need to say:
> ‘ Cells and electromagnetic field - they are you.’
> Is this formulation correct?
> Of course it is correct.
> Bioelectromagnetism (sometimes equated with bioelectricity)
> refers to the electrical, magnetic or electromagnetic fields
> produced by living cells, tissues or organisms.
> What does it mean?
> It means there isn’t biological cell without electromagnetic fields.
> It means that in the cell we have two ( 2 ) substances:
> matter and electromagnetic fields.
> And in 1985 Richard P. Feynman wrote book:
> QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter
> The idea of book - the interaction between light
> ( electromagnetic fields ) and matter is strange.
> He wrote: ‘ The theory of quantum electrodynamics
> describes Nature as absurd from the point of view
> of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment.
> So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd. ‘
> / page 10. /
> Once again:
> Cells and electromagnetic field - they are you.
> We cannot understand their interaction and therefore
> we don’t know the answer to the question: ‘ who am I ?’
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at