On 03 May 2012, at 23:45, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/3/2012 1:25 PM, John Clark wrote:
Lawrence M Krauss, author of the excellent book "Why is there
something rather than nothing?" recently wrote a article in
Scientific American, here is one quote I like"
It may be that even an eternal multiverse in which all universes
and laws of nature arise dynamically will still leave open some
‘why’ questions, and therefore never fully satisfy theologians and
some philosophers. But focusing on that issue and ignoring the
remarkable progress we can make toward answering perhaps the most
miraculous aspect of the something from nothing question—
understanding why there is ‘stuff’ and not empty space, why there
is space at all, and how both stuff and space and even the forces
we measure could arise from no stuff and no space—is, in my
opinion, impotent, and useless.
For more see:
There is another good article at:
John K Clark
See David Albert's review
Also see Vic Stenger's response to Albert's critique
Obviously comp is closer to Albert, but Albert is still ignorant of
Krauss illustrates how pseudo-religious science can be, from time to
Thanks to the links,
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at