On 5/7/2012 12:04 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 7, 1:25 pm, meekerdb<meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
The 'laws' of logic are just the rules of language that ensure we don't issue
You have to have logic to begin with to conceive of the desirability
of avoiding contradiction. Something has to put the 'contra' into our
No, you only need to understand negation, to have a language with the word 'not'. Then if
someone says to you "X" and "not-X" you immediately realize the need to avoid
contradiction, because a contradiction fails to express anything.
The 'laws' of quantum mechanics also follow from simple
assumptions about the world having symmetries (c.f. Russell Standish's "Theory of
and Vic Stenger's "The Comprehensible Cosmos") and having a symmetry is a kind
'nothing', i.e. having no distinguishing characteristic under some
Invariance is one aspect of symmetry,
It's an essential aspect. A symmetry is a property that is invariant under some
but you cannot reduce symmetry
to being a 'kind of nothing'. Symmetry cannot be anything less than a
feature of sense.
I can if I explicitly say what kind it is - which I did.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at