On May 15, 5:29 am, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 15 May 2012, at 04:48, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > On May 14, 2:11 pm, R AM <ramra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'm saying that decision making, learning, and reinforcement are
> >> possible
> >> in a deterministic world, and you are not denying it. I guess our
> >> points of
> >> view are orthogonal.
> > I am denying that meaningful decisions, learning, or reinforcement are
> > possible in a deterministic world.
> But a deterministic world, if rich enough to add and multiply, and
> thus to contain universal internal observers, leads already to
> indeterminist first person realities (even without comp, although it
> is simpler to use comp to justify this).
If a wave washes one pile of sand onto another, thereby 'adding' them
together, why does that generate universal internal observers?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at