On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On May 15, 7:19 am, R AM <ramra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com
> > > I would say that they cannot be meaningful in any sense, but I would
> > > allow that some may consider meaningless unconscious processes to be a
> > > form of decision, learning, or reinforcement.
> > OK, let's take Kasparov vs. Deep Blue, According to you, Kasparov's
> > decision making was meaningful, while Deep Blue's was not. Yet, Deep Blue
> > won. Is this the kind of meaninglessness you are talking here?
> Yes. Deep Blue didn't know the difference between winning or losing,
> let alone care.
The fact remains that good decision making can take place in a
deterministic world. Some decision-making you will label as meaningful,
some as meaningless. But good decision-making nevertheless. You cannot win
chess withouth making good decisions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at