On 5/20/2012 6:53 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
The result is an exhaustive classification of compact 4-mainifolds. The absence of such a classification neither prevents nor entails the existence of the manifolds.

But you fail to see that without the means to define the manifolds, there is nothing to distinguish a manifold from a fruitloop from a pink unicorn from a ..... Absent the means to distinguish properties there is no such thing as definite properties.

But there are means to distinguish the properties and ways to define different 4-manifolds and ways to determine whether two 4-manifolds are homeomorphic. If there weren't the theorem would be uninteresting. What makes it interesting, just as it is interesting that some programs compute a total function and some don't, it is interesting because there exist enough different 4-manifolds so that it is impossible to have a single algorithm classify them. You seem to be arguing that only a subset that can be calculated by some single algorithm can exist?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to