2012/5/31 Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>
> On May 31, 2:22 pm, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > To know what an interface is... how 2 programs communicate. The way you
> > talk is like "hey dude it's in the OS !"... like the operating system was
> > not a software...
> No, I'm saying it's all software, except for the hardware. That has
> been my point from the start. You can make as many virtual worlds
> nested within each other as you like and it doesn't matter. No
> interface is required because they are all being physically hosted by
> the semiconducting microelectronics.
> It is not a problem to have an avatar have virtual dinner in virtual
> Paris by using his virtual computer. He can dive into the monitor and
> end up on the Champs-Élysées if the programmer writes the virtual
> worlds that way. No interface can allow or restrict anything within a
> virtual context
You simply don't know what the terms means or you're stupid... one or the
other or both.
> - it's all an election by the programmer, not an
> ontological barrier.
> > like if you want to access the network you're not calling
> > a software... like in the end it was not writing something into some
> > in memory... pfff only thing I can say is "AhAhAh !!!"... as your "sense"
> > BS.
> When I use my keyboard to type these words, I am using hardware.
Which calls software, basically calling an interrupt and setting something
into memory to be read by other programs (os or driver or whatever)
> an avatar uses a virtual keyboard, or when that avatar's avatar's
> avatar uses a virtual virtual virtual keyboard, there is no keyboard
If you don't do a simulation no.. so what.
> The keyboard can be a turnip or a cloud, it doesn't matter. For
> me, in hardware world, it matters.
> > The way you don't understand "level"... when a emulator is in a
> > the second level emulator run on the first level emulated hardware...
> No, I understand exactly how you understand level but I am telling you
> that you are wrong. You are mistaking marketing hype for reality.
I write emulator, I know exactly how this works contrary to you.
> Emulation is a figure of speech.
> There is no virtual hardware.
> just one piece of software that acts like several. The organization of
> it is meaningless ontologically. The entire program is an
> epiphenomenon of the same piece of hardware.
> > which
> > run itself run on physical hardware, no program in the nth level could
> > access n-1 level hardware without the n-1 level emulator giving interface
> > to it.
> That is just not true and you aren't listening to what I'm saying. You
> are confusing user permissions with hardware to software interface.
> Every week I see nth level programs break n-1 OS and take down the
> entire node. It's not what you think. They use the same OS. There is
> only one copy of Windows Server 2008 that every container shares. If
> they had separate copies, there would still be a meta-OS that they
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at