On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:32 AM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> I agree with all you say, except the implication of the last sentence: that
> evolution would never produce results with some inessential side effect.
> First, evolution has to produce things by evolving - not starting from a
> clean sheet. In the case of consciousness I think it quite likely that this
> happened. Conscious thinking is similar to talking-to-yourself because
> evolution happened to take advantage of auditory processing of language to
> internalize symbolic cogitation. Second, even though the same result might
> be obtained in some other way, it might be less efficient in some sense to
> do so. We might conceivably make a human-acting robot that cogitated using
> a computer separate from the one used for processing language and while I
> think it would be conscious, it would be conscious in a different way.
The most plausible explanation is that consciousness is a necessary
side-effect of the type of information processing that goes at its
simplest stimulus->response->behaviour modification.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at