On 13 Sep 2012, at 13:44, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
BRUNO: Matter is what is not determined, and thus contingent indeed,
at its very roots, like W and M in a self-duplication experiment, or
like, plausibly when looking at a photon through a calcite crystal.
ROGER: So Newton's Laws, such as F = ma, are not deterministic ?
It means that F = ma, if correct, can only be an approximation of a
deeper non deterministic process. Note that it is actually the case,
as F=ma can be derived from the more fundamental schroedinger
equation, which indeed give rise to a first person plural indeterminacy.
ROGER: and in which men, so as not to be robots,
BRUNO: You might try to be polite with the robots, and with your
son in law, victim of pro-life doctors who gave him an artificial
brain without its consent. He does not complain on the
artificial brain, though, as he is glad to be alive. Do you think it
is a (philosophical) zombie? Come on! He is a Lutheran. Obviously,
if you decide that a machine cannot be a Lutheran, few machines will
ROGER: I may be wrong, but I don't see how an artifical brain can
have any awareness or intelligence, for these require life-- real
As you say, you might be wrong.
Nobody understand how a machine, or a brain, can feel, but machine can
already explain why they can know some true fact without being able to
justify them---at all.
With the good hypotheses, sometimes we can explain why there are
things that we cannot explain.
And you might be true, but your personal feeling cannot be used in
this setting, as they can only look like prejudices, even if true.
The best is to keep the mind open, to make clear assumptions and to
reason, without ever pretending to know the public truth.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at