On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:16:06PM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> Another question here would be who will divide the state space to a
> bacterium and environment. Let us imagine that we have implemented
> somehow a bacterium in Game of Life (or even better in Continuous
> Game of Life). What is meaning of "A bacterium travels" when there
> is no human observer?
> Or let me can put it this way. To find out whether a bacterium is
> there and to find out its coordinates, one could imagine an extra
> algorithms that analyses the state space of for example Continuous
> Game of Life. Now we run two different simulations.
> 1) Continuous Game of Life as it is.
> 2) Continuous Game of Life with an extra algorithm to find out if a
> bacterium is there and to report coordinates of the bacterium.
> Is there any difference between 1) and 2)?

A very pertinent question. I wish I knew the answer (myself and many
others too!).

There is a sort of proto-answer in the work of Jim Crutchfield. It is
possible (sort of) to come up with a workable definition of emergence
that doesn't require the presence of an observer (or rather he has a
metric to indicate what sorts of things are likely to be interesting
to an abstract observer - my emphasis).



Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to