On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:58:35AM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
> Hi Russell Standish  
> 1) It is a cruelty of nature to make the two IMHO most powerful thinkers
> (Peirce and Leibniz) to be the two most difficult to understand.
> I would not throw them out just yet.

I'm not. But until someone can demonstrate the utility of their
thought to a field of interest to me, I'm unlikely to want to invest
in them.

> 2) If somebody can make something useful out of autopoesis, 
> more power to them.  At first, it looked like the solution
> to everything, but then I just couldn't find anything to grasp.
> With the exception of Peirce, I found semiotics to be similar.

I think we're in agreement here (except on Peirce, perhaps).


Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to