On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
> On 10/27/2012 12:07 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>> I agree that " All of this discussion is below the level of conscious
>> self-awareness", but prefer to think of raw perception as
>> distinguishing what can be from what cannot be, as for example in
>> constructor theory.
>> In my model conscious awareness is an arithmetic emergent due to the
>> incompleteness of discrete, ennumerable compact manifolds. What can or
>> cannot be is at a lower level, perhaps due to discrete arithmetic
>> computations that may be teleological, a nod to Deacon as well as
> Hi Richard,
> Umm, interesting. The incompleteness forces consciousness... Please
That is what my paper is all about: http://vixra.org/pdf/1101.0044v1.pdf
It appears that your memory is no better than mine.
I went into physics because of my poor memory.
When I got kicked out, really black-balled due to the Star Wars protest
I managed to get into med school at age 55 but my memory failed me
and I had to settle for being a doctor of physics.
I am going to Hoboken to celebrate my 75th birthday with my son and grandson
over this weekend. So I will not be able to get on-line until Sunday night.
It's been fun.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at