On 11/4/2012 11:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:


The body problem *is* the result, and does constitute the conceptual explantion of why we believe in bodies, despite the lack of it in the ontology.

    Well, do you want this problem to be solvable?

Sure. And AUDA is a beginning of the solution, in a manner which makes possible to distinguish precisely the difference between "terrestrial/objective" and "divine/subjective", that the the many 1p and 3p views.
Dear Bruno,

But there is no an absolute 3p view! Such would be the 'view' of God and the Kolmogorov minimum algorithm that specified it would be God's name!

--
Onward!

Stephen


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to