Dear Bruno and other loyal followers of the list,

I had a thought tonight -- half baked and somewhat vague, but nevertheless 
I thought relevant to your discussions here...

Is it not true, on the basis of what you laid out in Sane2004, that there 
is a necessarily inverse relationship between omnipotence and omniscience? 
For consider, the UDA, whatever it may be, has the infinite power to 
continue to crank out the algorithim. We, as admittedly self-consistent and 
yet ignorant of the fact of our self-consistency, have the ability to be 
omniscient (in the sense that we know the math that leads to our lack of 
omniscience and yet implies a universal unfolding of every possibility, all 
of which you will be there to witness) yet utterly unable to interfere with 
the omnipotence of the UDA, which continues cranking out its various 
arithmetical possibilities through its own omnipotence, utterly oblivious 
of the subjectivity (ies) involved. 

I'm looking forward to all of your responses for the pleasure of learning 
about this stuff...

Thanks for all being so smart and lucid, even when you do have opinions I 
don't necessarily agree with (looking at you, John Clark)



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to