On 11/12/2012 12:15 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 11/11/2012 12:59 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
I like this definition that was posted in that forum: "*An agent is
rational if he/she does whatever the modeler (i.e. economist) would
do in his/her position."*
The problem is with "does". Flipping a coin and doing X if heads and
Y if tails can be the same optimum strategy for the modeler and the
rational agent. Yet if it comes up heads for the modeler but tails
for the rational agent they will *do* different things.
Sure, but we don't consider a single situation to give a general
definition of a behavior. The case of the mismatch of the coin flips
goes away when we look at many cases. There is a case to be made for
statistics in figuring out the definitions of rationality, no? Dogs do
not always bite the postman....
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at