On Monday, December 17, 2012 1:44:59 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > On 12/17/2012 12:13 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > Are these examples not good enough for you? One can change the name of a >> concept/theory... What has gotten into you? >> > > Why do you think something has 'gotten into me'? > Of those three on your list I have heard of one of them - Marcuse, but > *only* because my Right Wing history professor at UCSB made the entire > chapter on the 60s about him. Otherwise I would have never in my life have > known of his work - especially since he died 35 years ago. > > As for being under a rock, that's exactly my point. For myself and every > other person I have heard or read express Progressive views, I do not see > that they take their cues from these academics, which they are usually > unaware of. By contrast, many is the time that I will debate with a > Right-Libertarian and it is only a matter of time until Von Mises is > brought up (talk about idolatry). Progressives are people whose parents > didn't beat them and intimidate them, so they aren't afraid to think for > themselves, and they aren't afraid of letting go of that kind of > patriarchal model of control. Everything that you all have been saying here > is only making me more and more clear on the lack of real substance or > ideas behind Conservativism. It's 'Pay no attention to the man behind the > curtain!' writ large. The more Conservative ideas are understood, the more > Progressives there will be. > > Hey! > > Try this example of modern neo-marxists: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVWCYAchd7E >
Boycotting a restaurant is Marxist? I would think that using free speech to influence others not to spend their money at Chick-Fil-A would be a perfectly Libertarian pastime? > > > Try listening to Rush Limbaugh for 1 hour and think of him as Racheal > Maddow's Twin brother. > http://player.streamtheworld.com/_players/entercom/player/?id=WORD > > To be truly balanced, one must practice balance. Consider all views as > if they are a p.o.v. of God. The trick is to understand that all points of > view do not need to be finitely mutually consistent! > > "Love thy Neighbor as thyself." > I've listened to Rush several times. Not sure I have been able to stand it for a whole hour at a time, but I have listened before. Maddow definitely exaggerates but it pales in comparison to the outrageous stream of lies from Limbaugh and Beck. http://www.politifact.com/subjects/pundits/ Just look at the Right compared to Left in there. Should I go through and add them up or can you see how much more the Right relies on inflammatory fiction? Craig > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/L0h0fO-8U70J. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
