# Re: On the truth of comp -->Fw: 1p= pragmatic or experiential truth vs 3p = truth by calculation

```What is the point of redefining 1p and 3p this way?

If you want to do this, you should first show that you recover the
usual meanings of the terms, otherwise you may as well be speaking gibberish.```
```

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:33:04AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote:
>
> Note that
>
> 1p = contingent truth
>
> 3p = necessary truth
>
> So the question of whether comp is true or not is
> whether or when or where
>
> 1p = 3p
>
>
>
> ----- Have received the following content -----
> Sender: Roger Clough
> Time: 2012-12-26, 11:26:27
> Subject: 1p= pragmatic or experiential truth vs 3p = truth by calculation
>
>
> Hi everything-list
>
>
> IMHO that comp iis true or not is equalvalent to the question
>
>
> does
>
> 1p  =  3p  ?
>
> where
>
> 1p= truth by experience (or actuality) and
>
> 3p = truth by description  (by theory)
>
>
>
> [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
> 12/26/2012
> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
>

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to