On 26 Dec 2012, at 17:33, Roger Clough wrote:


Note that

1p = contingent truth

Not at all. Each person pov has its own set of necessities and contingencies.



3p = necessary truth

Not correct (in comp, and weakening of comp). There are many pure 3p arithmetical contingencies. This is highly counter-intuitive and is a consequence of Gödel's incompleteness, mainly. More on this later (perhaps on FOAR).



So the question of whether comp is true or not is
whether or when or where

1p = 3p

In God's eye, and nowhere else. In the computationalist theory.

Bruno





----- Have received the following content -----
Sender: Roger Clough
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-26, 11:26:27
Subject: 1p= pragmatic or experiential truth vs 3p = truth by calculation

Hi everything-list


IMHO that comp iis true or not is equalvalent to the question


does

1p  =  3p  ?

where

1p= truth by experience (or actuality) and

3p = truth by description  (by theory)



[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/26/2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to