A Summary of Peirce, Leibniz and Sheldrake on habits

Habits are the results of of the taming of random ensembles


 Leibniz states that there are two kinds of logic,  

a) necessary logic, which is always true (the timeless logic of Heaven or 
Platonia), and  

b) contingent logic, which is the time-based logic of earth , also called modal 

One puzzle is if there are a) things always true and b) other things only 
sometimes (or somewhere) true,  
couldn't there be a conflict ?  

Your concept of morphic resonance, or Peirce's Thirdness, might be the 
namely that habits are link between these two fields above:  

Habits are the tendencies (but not quite the necessity) of things to be true 
down here.  

>From a Christian perspective, the presence of the Kingdom of God in the 
>Kingdom of Earth.  

Also, you can think of Peirce's categories using a classical black box model.  

Firstness = input signal (contingent world, chance)  

Secondness = the black box or filter, which does the signal processing or  
convolution of input signal of contingent phenomena against law or mechanism.  

Thirdness = output signal (habit or tendencyt for lawful behavior)  

This also works for evolution, one verswion of which might be:  

Firstness = randomly chosen gene  

Secondness = that gene tested in a real situation  

Thirdness= surviving gene or new habit  


IMHO morphic resonance could be understood as modification of lawless behavior  
subjected to a lawful universe  

They've put hidden optical speed detectors on my neighborhood streets  
to slow down traffic. If you don't see the detectors and speed through,  
the detectors will flash photo your license plate and electronically issue  
you a speed ticket. Gradually everybody tends to slow down to meet the  
legal speed limit.  

A wild speculation is perhaps quantum mechanics behavior gradually  
adapts to enstein behavior in such a way.  

[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]  
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen  
----- Receiving the following content -----  
From: chris kramer  
Receiver: mindbr...@yahoogroups.com  
Time: 2013-01-02, 17:43:50  
Subject: Re: Re: [Mind and Brain] The Triune World: Various 
RepresentationsofPeirce's Triads  

Thanks Roger.  
What are your thoughts on his notions of belief and habit?  


From: Roger Clough  
To: "- mindbr...@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:14 AM  
Subject: Re: Re: [Mind and Brain] The Triune World: Various Representations 
ofPeirce's Triads  

Hi chris kramer  

Keep in mind that pragmatism doesn't have a metaphysics  
or ontology (an overall picture of reality, in which the particular  
can be obtained analytuically from the general).  

Instead, Peirce's praqgmatism is an epistempology  
(a method of synthetically obtaining a general from a particular).  

Only the method is defined (the categories),  
not what they obtain. The method is essentially  
that of experimental science, not scientific  
theory. Closer to Aristotle.  

So I would class Peirce's statements  
on ontology or God as typical of any scientist today,  
namely pretty much of a personal belief.  

I prefer Leibniz for a more ontological picture of  
God as that platonic entity (the One) which views and  
works on reality through the Supreme Monad (which could  
possibly be Jesus, Leibniz doesn't say).  

[Roger Clough], mailto:rclo...@verizon.net]  
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen  
----- Receiving the following content -----  
From: chris kramer  
Receiver: mailto:mindbr...@yahoogroups.com,everything-list@googlegroups.com  
Time: 2013-01-01, 14:00:11  
Subject: Re: [Mind and Brain] The Triune World: Various Representations 
ofPeirce's Triads  

The attachments of the original message is as following:  
  (1). peirce  
Does Peirce provide an understandable account of that which can exist wholly 
independent of anything (everything) else? I am assuming he refers to God; that 
which is ontologically independent. But what exactly can this mean?  

I am also interested in Peirce's notion of the "fixation of belief" and its 
contrast with the "irritation of doubt." When habits form, it seems we are less 
inclined to experiecne that irritation of doubt; this could be good, the they 
are good habits, or beliefs that somehow track the truth, or more 
pragmatically, provide a "cash value" for the believer; but could it not also 
lead to dogmatism?  


From: Roger Clough  
To: everything-list ; "- mindbr...@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 6:39 AM  
Subject: [Mind and Brain] The Triune World: Various Representations of Peirce's 

The Triune World: Various Representations of Peirce's Triads  

[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 12/31/2012  
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen  
__._,_.___Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic 
Messages in this topic (2)  

Recent Activity: New Members 4  
Visit Your Group  
 Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest ? Unsubscribe ? Terms of Use ? Send us 
Feedback .  

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to