On 1/10/2013 11:39 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:



2013/1/10 meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>>

    You can as well say collapse is saved because P=10^-6 > 0 and so probability
    calculus is working just fine.  Collapse and MWI use the same probability 
calculus.


And I repeat again, in MWI probability ***is not*** about happening, in QM+collapse ***it is***. In MWI it ***always always always always always*** happen so low is the probability is *irrelevant*, not in QM+collapse.

It only seems irrelevant because you assume infinitely many MW and so you no longer have a canonical probability measure, but you don't assume infinitely many instances of the collapse scenario.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to