On 1/10/2013 11:39 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:

2013/1/10 meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>>

    You can as well say collapse is saved because P=10^-6 > 0 and so probability
    calculus is working just fine.  Collapse and MWI use the same probability 

And I repeat again, in MWI probability ***is not*** about happening, in QM+collapse ***it is***. In MWI it ***always always always always always*** happen so low is the probability is *irrelevant*, not in QM+collapse.

It only seems irrelevant because you assume infinitely many MW and so you no longer have a canonical probability measure, but you don't assume infinitely many instances of the collapse scenario.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to