On 1/17/2013 7:11 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/17/2013 7:28 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com <mailto:agocor...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    You have to prove that the CO2 is the main ingredient of global warming. 
Not me.

Ok. So Greenhouse effect is "alarmist fantasy" to you. This makes things 

     But it is not.  It is water vapor by orders of magnitude. And the water 
    concentration, and the clouds depends on cosmic rays, and cosmic rays 
depend on
    solar activity and the variation on the earth orbit. The hockey stick 
(false) is of
    temperatures. And temperatures are falling now, like were falling in the 
70s. The
    most likely evolution is towards a new ice age, as you can see clearly in 

    CO2 do no predict increase of temperatures, it is just the contrary  You 
can verify
    that in the graphic. increase of temperature precedes CO2 increase. This is 
    by the increased erosion or carbonate rocks in the litosphere and the 
liberation of
    CO2 by oceans when temperature raises.  The causes of the cycles that you 
see in
    the graphic are due to the orbit of earth around the sun, there is no CO2 
    but the opposite. the correlation exist, but the causation is just the 
reverse to
    the promoted by the alarmists.

    Natural sources of CO2 exceed the antropogenic production by orders of 
magnitude. a
    single eruption can produce more CO2 than the entire human population in a 

You're right in that it's naturally messy enough.

But so what? 313 ppm in 1960 to 390 ppm in 2010, with current measured amount of CO2 exceeding geological maximum values; I just don't see the logic of adding to this mindlessly by burning more black stuff. I do see the plausibility of shooting for long term energy solutions that add, burn, or otherwise muck around with the fragile global ecology, our only home at the moment, less. And I'm open to all of it, hemp prominently included, provided that we burn/waste less in the long run.

No final solutions. These problems will not leave, regardless of our capacity to deny infinitely.


Your making a straw man argument, mate! Even if we stipulate as a fact that "...current measured amount of CO2 exceeding geological maximum values", this does nothing to force decisions such as how not to "muck around with the fragile global ecology". It is the home of all of us, not jush some elite few that wish the rest us us to stop breathing. I have read the papers of the alarmist with eyes wide open, there is lots of discussion of how to "reduce populations" and so forth. There is even chatter about "crimes against nature" tribunals for those that "deny the consensus science".

How about some actual quotes and citations - lest we suspect you of creating a 
straw man.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to