On 20 Jan 2013, at 20:44, meekerdb wrote:

On 1/20/2013 3:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

I agree. It is always better to stick to the most common sense of the words.

That's funny coming from a guy who used "God" to designate abstract computations.

God, matter, consciousness are never computable. Where did I ever used "God" to designate computations. It seems to me that I insist a lot for not making that kind of spurious identification. I have identified, in the comp context, "God" with Arithmetical Truth, explaining why it makes "God" unnameable by machines.
Computation are Sigma_1
Truth is Sigma_1 union Sigma_2 union Sigma_3 union Sigma_4 union ...

You are a bit quick here, Brent,



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to