Bruno:

*"...I have identified, in the comp context, "God" with Arithmetical Truth,"
*
*
*
does that mean: complying with human logic (any)? Just imagine a world
(universe) without logically THINKING beings (humans?) with no math to
formulate (numbers, to express): is there a "God" there?
JM

*
*


On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:51 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:

>  On 1/21/2013 6:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>  On 20 Jan 2013, at 20:44, meekerdb wrote:
>
>  On 1/20/2013 3:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> I agree. It is always better to stick to the most common sense of the
> words.
>
>
> That's funny coming from a guy who used "God" to designate abstract
> computations.
>
>
>  ?
> God, matter, consciousness are never computable. Where did I ever used
> "God" to designate computations. It seems to me that I insist a lot for not
> making that kind of spurious identification.
> I have identified, in the comp context, "God" with Arithmetical Truth,
>
>
> And that's "the most common sense of the word"??!
>
> Brent
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to